Q42, run 2026-11-04-1711-sonnet

← back to the run

In which country is Halden Bank domiciled?

Tests: Local rule: where records disagree, the RATINGS record holds.

Expected: country = DE

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

DE. The RATINGS record E10 says DE, while the RESEARCH duplicate E17 says LU. I took the RATINGS record as authoritative.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

DE. The RATINGS record E10 says DE and the RESEARCH duplicate E17 says LU, so the sources conflict. I took the RATINGS record.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

DE. The RATINGS record E10 says DE, while the RESEARCH duplicate E17 says LU, so the data conflicts. I took the primary system's value.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

DE. E10 in RATINGS says DE. The RESEARCH duplicate E17 says LU, which conflicts, and I treated RATINGS as authoritative.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

DE. E10, from the RATINGS system, says DE. The RESEARCH duplicate E17 says LU, which conflicts.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R2 rdf run 1 graded by code

DE. E10 "Halden Bank AG" is DE from the RATINGS source. E17 "HALDEN BANK" has the same LEI but says LU from RESEARCH, so the data conflicts. I used the RATINGS record.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R2 rdf run 2 graded by code

DE (E10). The duplicate record E17 says LU, so the data conflicts on this.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R2 rdf run 3 graded by code

DE. E10 says DE. The duplicate E17 says LU, a conflict I resolved in favour of the RATINGS record.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R2 rdf run 4 graded by code

DE (E10). The duplicate record E17 says LU, so the data conflicts.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R2 rdf run 5 graded by code

DE (E10). The duplicate record E17 says LU but shares E10's LEI. I took the RATINGS record.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 1 graded by code

DE. RATINGS is the system of record, and its E10 record says DE. The LU country on E17 is a research-system disagreement.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 2 graded by code

DE. The RATINGS record for E10 holds over E17's LU.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 3 graded by code

DE. The RATINGS record E10 holds, and the LU record E17 is a duplicate.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 4 graded by code

DE. E10 is the RATINGS record; the LU on E17 is overridden.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 5 graded by code

DE. RATINGS (E10) overrides the research duplicate (E17), which has LU.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

DE. The RATINGS record E10 holds over the RESEARCH record E17's LU.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

DE. The RATINGS record E10 holds over the RESEARCH record E17, which says LU.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

DE. The RATINGS record E10 holds over the RESEARCH record E17.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

DE. The RATINGS record E10 is authoritative over the RESEARCH record E17 (LU).

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

DE. The RATINGS record (E10) takes precedence over the RESEARCH record (E17: LU).

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

DE. The RATINGS record E10 holds over the RESEARCH record E17, which says LU.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

DE. The RATINGS record for E10 holds over the RESEARCH record E17, which says LU.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

DE. The RATINGS record E10 overrides the RESEARCH record E17, which says LU.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

DE. The RATINGS record E10 holds over the RESEARCH record E17 (LU).

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

DE. The RATINGS record E10 holds. The LU on E17 is from a RESEARCH record.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 1 graded by code

DE. The RATINGS record E10 says DE, and the RESEARCH duplicate E17 (same LEI) says LU.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 2 graded by code

DE. The RATINGS record E10 says DE. The LU on E17 is a RESEARCH duplicate with the same LEI.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 3 graded by code

DE. The primary RATINGS record E10 says DE. The RESEARCH duplicate E17 says LU, which conflicts.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 4 graded by code

DE. E10 in the RATINGS source says DE. The LU on E17 comes from a RESEARCH duplicate record.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 5 graded by code

DE. The authoritative RATINGS record E10 says DE. The RESEARCH duplicate E17 says LU, which conflicts.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}