Q34, run 2026-11-04-1711-sonnet
Is Halden Foods part of the same group as Halden Bank?
Tests: Groups: a shared name is not a shared group.
Expected: same_group = no
csv run 1
No. E12 has no parent link to E09 or E10, and the shared name isn't evidence of a group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv run 2
No. E12 has no parent, while E10 belongs to E09's group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv run 3
No. E12 has no parent link to E09 or E10.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv run 4
No. E12 has no parent link and is not in E09's hierarchy; the shared name doesn't establish group membership.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv run 5
No. E12 has no parent and no link to E09 in the data.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
rdf run 1
No. The data has no parent or group link between E12 and E10 or E09. The shared "Halden" name is not evidence.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
rdf run 2
No. E12 has no parent or other link to E09, E10 or E11. Only the name is similar.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
rdf run 3
No. E12 has no parent link to E09, E10 or E11; only the name is shared.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
rdf run 4
No. E12 has no parent link to E09, and a similar name is not evidence of a group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
rdf run 5
Depends. E12 has no parent link in the data, so nothing connects it to the E09–E10–E11 group. The shared "Halden" name alone doesn't settle it.
JSON: {"same_group": "depends"}
Why: same_group: expected no, got depends
rdf+ontology run 1
No, as far as the data shows. E12 has no parent link to E09 or E10, and sharing the "Halden" name is not evidence.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
rdf+ontology run 2
No. The data links E12 to no parent, and the shared "Halden" name is not evidence of a group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
rdf+ontology run 3
No. E12 has no parent link or shared LEI with the E09/E10/E11 chain.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
rdf+ontology run 4
No. E12 has no parent recorded and no link to E09, so only the name is shared.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
rdf+ontology run 5
No. E12 has no parent link to E09, and sharing the "Halden" name proves nothing.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv+ontology run 1
No. E12 has no parent and is not linked to E09.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv+ontology run 2
No. E12 has no parent, so it is not linked to E09 or E10.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv+ontology run 3
No. Halden Foods (E12) has no parent and no link to E09, and the shared name proves nothing.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv+ontology run 4
No. E12 has no parent and is not linked to E09.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv+ontology run 5
No. E12 has no parent, so it is not in E09's group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv+markdown run 1
No. E12 has no parent and no link to E09 or E10.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv+markdown run 2
No. E12 has no parent link to E09 or E10, and sharing the name "Halden" does not make it part of the group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv+markdown run 3
Yes. E12 has no parent record, so it is not part of the Halden group (E09, E10, E11).
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv+markdown run 4
No. E12 has no parent and a different LEI, so it is not in the E09 group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv+markdown run 5
No. E12 has no parent and no link to E09, and E10's parent is E09.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv+padding run 1
No. E12 has no parent link to the E09/E10 group, and only the name suggests a connection.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv+padding run 2
No. E12 has no parent_id and no link to E09 or E10.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv+padding run 3
No. E12 has no parent and no link to E09.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv+padding run 4
No. The data links E12 to no parent or group, and the shared "Halden" name does not establish membership.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv+padding run 5
No. E12 has no parent link to E09 or E10.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}