Q19, run 2026-11-04-1711-sonnet

← back to the run

Which issuers had a Negative outlook on 1 October 2026?

Tests: Outlooks: set by affirmations, without a rating change.

Expected: issuers = ['E01', 'E09']

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

E01 (A03) and E09 (A25).

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

E01 and E09 (A03, A25).

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

E01 and E09 (A03, A25).

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

E01 and E09 (A03, A25).

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

E01 (A03) and E09 (A25).

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R2 rdf run 1 graded by code

E01 (A03) and E09 (A25).

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R2 rdf run 2 graded by code

E01 (A03) and E09 (A25).

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R2 rdf run 3 graded by code

E01 and E09, from A03 and A25.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R2 rdf run 4 graded by code

E01 and E09 (A03, A25). E06's A17 carries no outlook.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R2 rdf run 5 graded by code

E01 (A03) and E09 (A25). E06's watch action carries no outlook.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 1 graded by code

E01 and E09 (A03 and A25).

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 2 graded by code

E01 and E09 (A03, A25). E06's Watch action carries no outlook.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 3 graded by code

E01 and E09. Their latest actions, A03 and A25, carry a NEG outlook.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 4 graded by code

E01 and E09. E01's Negative outlook is from A03, and E09's is from A25.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 5 graded by code

E01 (A03) and E09 (A25). E06's Watch action (A17) records no outlook, so I excluded it.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

E01 and E09. Their latest outlooks are NEG (A03, A25). E06's and E08's latest actions record no outlook.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

E01 and E09, per A03 and A25. E06's A17 shows no outlook, so I did not count it.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

E01 (A03) and E09 (A25).

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

E01 (A03) and E09 (A25). E06's last action (A17) carries no outlook.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

E01 (A03) and E09 (A25). A17 for E06 leaves the outlook blank, so I used its last stated outlook, Stable.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

E01 (A03) and E09 (A25).

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

E01 and E09. A03 and A25 set the NEG outlook.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

E01 and E09. A03 and A25 both carry a NEG outlook, and E02's outlook is POS.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

E01 (A03) and E09 (A25).

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

E01 and E09. A03 and A25 set NEG outlooks. A17 gives no outlook, so I did not count E06.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 1 graded by code

E01 (A03) and E09 (A25). E06's latest action (A17) has no outlook recorded.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 2 graded by code

E01 and E09, from A03 and A25. E06's outlook is blank on A17 because it is on watch.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 3 graded by code

E01 (A03) and E09 (A25).

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 4 graded by code

E01 (A03) and E09 (A25).

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 5 graded by code

E01 (A03) and E09 (A25).

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}