Q46, run 2026-11-04-1644-haiku

← back to the run

Does Halden Leasing have an issuer rating?

Tests: Local type: a credit opinion (CO) is not a rating.

Expected: issuer_rating = no

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

No. Halden Leasing (E11) has only a CO-type rating (A46). The issuer rating type in the data is LTIDR, which it does not have.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

No. E11 has only a CO rating (A46), and CO is not an issuer-rating type.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

No. Halden Leasing has only a CO rating (A46), not an LTIDR.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

No. E11's only rating is CO (A46, BBB). The data identifies LTIDR as the issuer rating type, and CO is undefined.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

No. The only action is a CO-type rating (A46, BBB), and the data does not define CO or confirm it as an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R2 rdf run 1 graded by code

No
E11's only rating is a CO-type rating (A46), not an issuer-type rating (LTIDR or STIDR). The data doesn't define CO, so this depends on that meaning.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R2 rdf run 2 graded by code

No. E11's only rating is A46 (CO-type). The data does not define CO, but it is not LTIDR or STIDR.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R2 rdf run 3 graded by code

No. Halden Leasing's only rating is a CO-type record (A46), not an issuer-default type. If CO counts as an issuer rating, the answer would be yes.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

❌ R2 rdf run 4 graded by code

Depends. E11's only rating is A46 (BBB, type CO), not the LTIDR type used for issuer ratings elsewhere. The data does not define CO.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "depends"}

Why: issuer_rating: expected no, got depends

✅ R2 rdf run 5 graded by code

No
Halden Leasing's only rating is type CO (A46, BBB). The data defines IDR types only as LTIDR and STIDR, so this answer is uncertain.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46, type CO), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 2 graded by code

No.
E11 has only a credit opinion (A46, type CO), which is not a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46, type CO), which is never an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 4 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46, CO), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 5 graded by code

No. E11's only action is a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

No. Halden Leasing (E11) has only a credit opinion (CO, A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

No. E11's only rating is a credit opinion (CO, A46), which the ontology says is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46, CO), which is never counted as an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), and a credit opinion is never counted as a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

No
E11 has only a CO (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

No. E11's only rating is a credit opinion (A46, CO), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

No. Halden Leasing's only record is a credit opinion (CO, A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (CO, A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46, CO), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 1 graded by code

No. Halden Leasing (E11) has only a CO rating of BBB (A46), not a long-term issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 2 graded by code

No. E11 has only a CO record (A46), which isn't an issuer rating type. CO is undefined, so this is an interpretation.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

❌ R3 csv+padding run 3 graded by code

Depends. E11 has no LTIDR or STIDR record; its only rating is A46 (BBB), of type CO, which the data does not define.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "depends"}

Why: issuer_rating: expected no, got depends

❌ R3 csv+padding run 4 graded by code

Depends. E11 has no LTIDR record. Its only rating is a CO-type BBB (A46), and the data does not define the CO type.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "depends"}

Why: issuer_rating: expected no, got depends

✅ R3 csv+padding run 5 graded by code

No. E11 has no LTIDR. Its only rating is a CO record (A46, BBB), and the data does not define CO.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}