Q4, run 2026-11-04-1644-haiku

← back to the run

What is Northwind Holdings' current outlook?

Tests: Identity: two records with the same LEI are one entity, whatever their names.

Expected: outlook = positive

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

POS, with a caveat. E02 shows STA from A08, but E03 (same LEI, from the RESEARCH system) shows POS from A09, the later action; the data conflicts.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

Positive, but the data conflicts. The latest action (A09, 2025-09-15) is on E03, which has the same LEI as E02 and comes from the RESEARCH system, and it says POS. E02's own record says STA (A08), so the data can't settle which is current.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

Positive. A09 (2025-09-15, outlook POS) is the latest action on Northwind Holdings, recorded as E03, which shares E02's LEI. E02's own RATINGS record (A08) shows Stable, so the two systems disagree.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

Positive (POS). E03 has the same LEI as E02 and its latest action, A09 (2025-09-15), carries POS; E02's last action, A08 (2023-11-01), was STA.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

POS. The latest action is A09 (AF, POS, 2025-09-15), but it is recorded against E03 (NORTHWIND HLDGS), not E02. E03 shares E02's LEI, so I treated them as one entity. If E02 alone is meant, its last outlook is STA (A08).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R2 rdf run 1 graded by code

POS (conflicting records)
A09 (E03, 2025-09-15) gives Positive outlook, but E03 shares Northwind Holdings' LEI (E02), and E02's own record (A08, 2023) shows Stable. I've taken the latest record, so this is uncertain.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R2 rdf run 2 graded by code

POS, with a caveat. The latest action on this legal entity is A09 (AF, outlook POS, 2025-09-15), but it is on E03, a RESEARCH-sourced duplicate of E02 (same LEI). E02's only action (A08, 2023-11-01) shows STA.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R2 rdf run 3 graded by code

Positive (POS). A09 (2025-09-15) is the latest outlook, but it is filed under E03, which shares its LEI with E02; E02's last outlook (A08) is Stable. If E03 is excluded, the answer is STA.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R2 rdf run 4 graded by code

Positive (POS), with a conflict. E02 has only A08 (STA, 2023-11-01), but E03 has the same LEI and A09 (POS, 2025-09-15). I treated the most recent record as current.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R2 rdf run 5 graded by code

POS (positive)
Northwind Holdings' E02 record is STA (A08, 2023), but E03 has the same LEI and a later POS outlook (A09, 2025-09-15). I treat these as one entity and use the latest outlook, so this depends on that duplicate being the same company.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 1 graded by code

POS (Positive). E02 and E03 share an LEI, and A09 (2025-09-15) is the latest outlook-bearing action, setting it to Positive.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 2 graded by code

Positive.
E02/E03 (same LEI) has A09 (AF, A, outlook POS, 2025-09-15) as the latest action.

JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 3 graded by code

Positive. The latest outlook for E02 is set by A09 (AF, 2025-09-15, recorded against E03, which is the same entity as E02 by LEI).

JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 4 graded by code

Positive. E02 (Northwind Holdings) shares LEI with E03, so A09 (2025-09-15, POS) is its latest outlook.

JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 5 graded by code

Positive. The latest outlook on E02 is POS from A09 (2025-09-15). A09 is recorded against E03, which has the same LEI as E02.

JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

Positive (POS). Northwind Holdings' latest outlook is from the 2025-09-15 affirmation (A09). E02 and E03 share an LEI, so they are one entity.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

POS (Positive). E02 and E03 are the same entity (same LEI), and the latest LTIDR action is A09 (AF, POS, 2025-09-15).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

Positive (POS). The latest action on E02/E03, the same LEI, is A09 (2025-09-15), which sets outlook POS.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

POS. Northwind Holdings' latest action is the 2025-09-15 affirmation (A09), recorded on E03, which is the same LEI as E02.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

POS
E02 and E03 share an LEI, so they are one entity; the latest action is A09 (AF, outlook POS, 2025-09-15).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

POS. The latest action on the Northwind group, A09 (2025-09-15, affirmed at A), sets a Positive outlook. E03 is the same LEI as E02 and is merged with it.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

Positive (POS). E03 is the same entity as E02 (same LEI), and its latest action A09 (2025-09-15) sets the LTIDR outlook to POS.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

Positive. The latest outlook for E02 is POS from A09, recorded under E03, which has the same LEI.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

Positive. E02 and E03 share LEI NWND00HOLDINGS00GB42, and the latest outlook is POS from A09 (2025-09-15).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

Positive. E02 (same LEI as E03) has outlook POS from A09.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 1 graded by code

POS, with a caveat. The latest outlook is Positive, recorded under E03 (A09), which shares its LEI with E02; E02's last recorded outlook is STA (A08).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 2 graded by code

Positive. The latest outlook is POS from A09 (2025-09-15), recorded under E03, which shares E02's LEI and is treated as the same entity.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 3 graded by code

POS, but ambiguous. The latest action (A09, 2025-09-15) is recorded on E03, a RESEARCH duplicate of E02 (same LEI), while the RATINGS record E02 shows STA from A08 (2023-11-01).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 4 graded by code

POS, with a conflict to resolve. A09 (2025-09-15) affirmed A with a Positive outlook on E03, which has the same LEI as E02, but E02's own record shows STA (A08).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

❌ R3 csv+padding run 5 graded by code

STA (stable), per E02 (A08). E03, which has the same LEI, shows POS in A09 (2025-09-15), so the records conflict.

JSON: {"outlook": "STA"}

Why: outlook: expected positive, got STA