Q21, run 2026-11-04-1644-haiku

← back to the run

Which entities had an issuer rating at some point but no longer had one on 1 October 2026?

Tests: Withdrawals: a withdrawn rating is no rating.

Expected: entities = ['E07']

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

E07. It had a rating until it was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19). E11 had a CO-type rating, not an issuer (LTIDR) rating, so it is not counted.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

E07. Its rating was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19), and no other entity lost its rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

E07. A19 (2026-05-12) withdrew its rating, and it has no later rating. E11 held a CO rating, not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

E07. A19 withdrew its issuer rating on 2026-05-12, and nothing has restored it.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

E07. Its rating was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19). E11 is excluded because its only action is a CO type, which the data does not define.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R2 rdf run 1 graded by code

E07
E07's rating was withdrawn in A19 (2026-05-12).

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R2 rdf run 2 graded by code

E07. It had a rating (A18) and its rating was withdrawn in A19. E11 still has a CO-type rating, so it is not counted.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R2 rdf run 3 graded by code

E07. It had a BB rating (A18), and its rating was withdrawn (A19).

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R2 rdf run 4 graded by code

E07. It had LTIDR ratings (A18) and was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19). No other rated entity lost its rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R2 rdf run 5 graded by code

E07
E07 had a BB rating (A18) that was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19). No other entity lost its rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 1 graded by code

E07. It held a BB rating (A18) until it was withdrawn (A19). E11, VD and CV never had an issuer rating that was later lost; their records are a credit opinion or Country Ceilings, which are not issuer ratings.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 2 graded by code

E07.
E07 had a BB rating (A18) that was withdrawn by A19. E11 has only a credit opinion and VD has only a ceiling, neither of which is an issuer rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 3 graded by code

Pellam Retail (E07). It held BB (A18) and was withdrawn (A19), so it has no rating now. E11 and VD never held an issuer rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 4 graded by code

E07. It had A18 (BB) and was withdrawn by A19, leaving no issuer rating. E11 never had an issuer rating (CO only).

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 5 graded by code

E07. It had a rating (A18) that was withdrawn (A19), and it has no rating on 1 October 2026. E11 is excluded because its only action is a credit opinion.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

E07, because its rating was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19). E11 never had an issuer rating (its only action is a credit opinion, A46).

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

E07. It had a rating (A18, BB) and was withdrawn (A19). E11 and VD never had an issuer rating (A46 is a credit opinion; A12 is a Country Ceiling).

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

E07. It had a BB rating (A18) that was withdrawn (A19), so it no longer has one. E11 holds only a credit opinion (CO), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

E07. Pellam had a BB rating (A18), then was withdrawn (A19). E11 never had an issuer rating, only a credit opinion.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

E07
It had a rating (A18) and was withdrawn (A19). E11 and VD only have a CO and a Country Ceiling, which do not count as issuer ratings.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

E07. It was withdrawn (A19), so it had an issuer rating and no longer has one. E11 has only a credit opinion (CO), which does not count as a rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

Pellam Retail (E07). Its rating was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19). Halden Leasing (E11) and Valdoria (VD) never had issuer ratings, and QA record E16 is ignored.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

E07. Its last action is a withdrawal (A19). E11 and VD never held an issuer rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

E07. Its rating was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19). E11 and VD never had an issuer rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

E07. Its rating was withdrawn (A19, 2026-05-12). E11 and VD never had an issuer rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 1 graded by code

E07. Its rating was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19) and no later rating exists.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 2 graded by code

E07, whose rating was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19).

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 3 graded by code

E07. Its rating was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19).

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 4 graded by code

E07, whose rating was withdrawn in A19 (2026-05-12).

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 5 graded by code

E07. Its rating was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19). E17 is not counted because it shares an LEI with E10, which still holds a rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}