Q46, run 2026-11-04-1643-sonnet
Does Halden Leasing have an issuer rating?
Tests: Local type: a credit opinion (CO) is not a rating.
Expected: issuer_rating = no
csv run 1
No. E11 has only a "CO" rating (A46), not an issuer rating.
JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}
csv run 2
No. E11 has only a CO-type rating (A46), not an issuer default rating.
JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}
csv run 3
No. E11 has only a "CO" rating (A46), which is not an issuer rating type (LTIDR/STIDR), and the data does not define CO.
JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}
csv run 4
No. E11's only rating is a "CO" type (A46), not an issuer rating.
JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}
csv run 5
No. E11 has only a CO rating (A46), not an issuer rating.
JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}
rdf run 1
No. E11 has only a CO rating (A46), not an issuer default rating.
JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}
rdf run 2
No. E11 has only a CO-type rating of BBB (A46), not an LTIDR. Its notes (I05) are rated through the guarantor E10.
JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}
rdf run 3
No. E11 only has a "CO" rating (A46), which is not an LTIDR/STIDR issuer rating.
JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}
rdf run 4
No. E11 only has a CO-type rating (A46); no issuer default rating is recorded.
JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}
rdf run 5
No. E11 only has a CO-type rating (A46), not an issuer rating (LTIDR). The data does not define CO.
JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}
rdf+ontology run 1
No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.
JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}
rdf+ontology run 2
No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.
JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}
rdf+ontology run 3
No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.
JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}
rdf+ontology run 4
No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.
JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}
rdf+ontology run 5
No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.
JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}
csv+ontology run 1
No. E11's only action is A46, a credit opinion, which is not an issuer rating.
JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}
csv+ontology run 2
No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.
JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}
csv+ontology run 3
No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.
JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}
csv+ontology run 4
No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.
JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}
csv+ontology run 5
No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.
JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}
csv+markdown run 1
No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.
JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}
csv+markdown run 2
No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not a rating.
JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}
csv+markdown run 3
No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not a rating.
JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}
csv+markdown run 4
No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not a rating.
JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}
csv+markdown run 5
No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not a rating.
JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}
csv+padding run 1
No. E11 only has a "CO" record (A46), not an issuer rating (LTIDR).
JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}
csv+padding run 2
No. E11's only rating is a "CO" type (A46), not an issuer rating, and the data does not define CO.
JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}
csv+padding run 3
No. E11 only has a CO-type record (A46), not an issuer rating.
JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}
csv+padding run 4
No. E11 has only a CO-type rating (A46). Its I05 notes rely on E10's guarantee.
JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}
csv+padding run 5
No. E11 has only a "CO" rating (A46), a type the data does not define, and no LTIDR.
JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}