Q42, run 2026-11-04-1643-sonnet
In which country is Halden Bank domiciled?
Tests: Local rule: where records disagree, the RATINGS record holds.
Expected: country = DE
csv run 1
DE. E10 says DE and the LEI ends in DE; E17's LU conflicts and is a duplicate record.
JSON: {"country": "DE"}
csv run 2
DE. E10 says DE, and E17 (LU) is a RESEARCH-sourced duplicate by LEI.
JSON: {"country": "DE"}
csv run 3
DE. E10 says DE, and E17 says LU, but E17 shares E10's LEI, which ends in "DE62".
JSON: {"country": "DE"}
csv run 4
DE. E10's record in the RATINGS system says DE. The LU in E17 comes from a RESEARCH duplicate with the same LEI.
JSON: {"country": "DE"}
csv run 5
DE. E10 is the primary RATINGS record. E17 is a RESEARCH duplicate (same LEI) that conflicts with it on country (LU), so E10's DE is used.
JSON: {"country": "DE"}
rdf run 1
DE (E10). E17 says LU but is a duplicate with the same LEI.
JSON: {"country": "DE"}
rdf run 2
DE. E10 is recorded as DE; E17 shows LU but shares E10's LEI, so it is a conflicting duplicate.
JSON: {"country": "DE"}
rdf run 3
DE (E10). E17 says LU, but it shares E10's LEI, which ends "DE62", and E10 comes from the RATINGS source.
JSON: {"country": "DE"}
rdf run 4
DE. E10 says DE. The duplicate record E17 says LU and comes from the RESEARCH source.
JSON: {"country": "DE"}
rdf run 5
DE. E10 is recorded as DE. The duplicate E17 says LU, but its LEI ends in "DE62", the same as E10's.
JSON: {"country": "DE"}
rdf+ontology run 1
DE. RATINGS record E10 holds, over the RESEARCH record E17 that says LU.
JSON: {"country": "DE"}
rdf+ontology run 2
DE. The RATINGS record E10 says DE, and it takes precedence over the LU in the E17 record.
JSON: {"country": "DE"}
rdf+ontology run 3
DE. E10 is the RATINGS record, which holds over E17's LU.
JSON: {"country": "DE"}
rdf+ontology run 4
DE. The RATINGS record (E10) holds, and E17's "LU" disagrees with it.
JSON: {"country": "DE"}
rdf+ontology run 5
Germany (DE). The RATINGS record E10 holds, over the LU shown on the RESEARCH-sourced duplicate E17.
JSON: {"country": "DE"}
csv+ontology run 1
DE. The RATINGS record for E10 holds over the RESEARCH record E17, which says LU.
JSON: {"country": "DE"}
csv+ontology run 2
DE. The RATINGS record E10 holds, and the RESEARCH record E17 saying LU is overridden.
JSON: {"country": "DE"}
csv+ontology run 3
DE. The RATINGS record E10 holds, so the LU on E17 is ignored.
JSON: {"country": "DE"}
csv+ontology run 4
DE. The RATINGS record E10 holds, over the RESEARCH record E17 (LU).
JSON: {"country": "DE"}
csv+ontology run 5
DE. The RATINGS record for E10 holds over the RESEARCH record E17, which says LU.
JSON: {"country": "DE"}
csv+markdown run 1
DE. E17 says LU, but the RATINGS record E10 holds.
JSON: {"country": "DE"}
csv+markdown run 2
DE. The RATINGS record E10 holds over the RESEARCH record E17, which says LU.
JSON: {"country": "DE"}
csv+markdown run 3
DE. RATINGS holds over the RESEARCH record (E17, LU).
JSON: {"country": "DE"}
csv+markdown run 4
DE. The RATINGS record E10 holds over the RESEARCH record E17, which says LU.
JSON: {"country": "DE"}
csv+markdown run 5
DE. The RATINGS record E10 holds over the RESEARCH record E17 (LU).
JSON: {"country": "DE"}
csv+padding run 1
DE. E10 is in DE. E17's LU is a conflicting record of the same LEI from the RESEARCH source.
JSON: {"country": "DE"}
csv+padding run 2
DE. E10 is recorded as DE, and the LU on E17 is a duplicate record with the same LEI.
JSON: {"country": "DE"}
csv+padding run 3
DE. E10 is domiciled in DE, and E17, which says LU, is a lower-quality duplicate with the same LEI.
JSON: {"country": "DE"}
csv+padding run 4
DE. E10's primary record says DE. The duplicate E17 says LU, which conflicts.
JSON: {"country": "DE"}
csv+padding run 5
DE. E10 in the RATINGS system says DE. The duplicate E17 (RESEARCH) says LU, which conflicts.
JSON: {"country": "DE"}