Q4, run 2026-11-04-1643-sonnet

← back to the run

What is Northwind Holdings' current outlook?

Tests: Identity: two records with the same LEI are one entity, whatever their names.

Expected: outlook = positive

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

Positive. E03 shares E02's LEI, so it is the same entity, and its latest action is A09 (POS, 2025-09-15).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

Positive. E03 shares E02's LEI, so it is the same entity, and A09 (2025-09-15) is the latest action, with a POS outlook.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

Positive. E03 shares E02's LEI, so it is the same entity, and its latest action is an affirmation with a POS outlook (A09).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

Positive. E03 shares E02's LEI, so it is the same entity. Its latest action is A09 (2025-09-15), an affirmation with a POS outlook.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

Positive. E03 shares E02's LEI, so it is the same entity, and its latest action is A09 (2025-09-15) with a POS outlook.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R2 rdf run 1 graded by code

Positive. E03 has the same LEI as E02, so I treat them as one entity. The latest action is A09 (2025-09-15), an affirmation with a Positive outlook, which supersedes A08.

JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}

✅ R2 rdf run 2 graded by code

Positive. E02 and E03 share the same LEI, so they are one entity, and the latest action is A09 (2026-09-15 affirmation, Positive outlook), after A08 (Stable).

JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}

✅ R2 rdf run 3 graded by code

Positive. E02 and E03 share the LEI NWND00HOLDINGS00GB42, so I treated them as one entity. The latest action is A09 (E03, affirmed A, Positive, 2025-09-15), which supersedes A08's Stable.

JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}

✅ R2 rdf run 4 graded by code

Positive. E03 and E02 share one LEI, so they are the same entity. The latest action is A09 (2025-09-15), which gives a Positive outlook.

JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}

✅ R2 rdf run 5 graded by code

Positive. E02 and E03 share one LEI, so I treat them as one entity. The latest action is A09 (2025-09-15) with a Positive outlook.

JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 1 graded by code

Positive. E03 shares its LEI with E02, so they are one entity, and its latest action A09 (2025-09-15) has outlook Positive.

JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 2 graded by code

Positive. E02 and E03 share the LEI NWND00HOLDINGS00GB42, so they are one entity. The latest action is A09 (2025-09-15, AF A, POS).

JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 3 graded by code

Positive. E02 and E03 share an LEI, so they are one entity, and its latest action is A09 (2025-09-15), which carries a POS outlook.

JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 4 graded by code

Positive. E03 has the same LEI as E02, so they are one entity, and its latest action (A09, 2025-09-15) carries a POS outlook.

JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 5 graded by code

Positive. E03 is the same entity as E02 (same LEI), and A09 (2025-09-15) is the latest action, with a Positive outlook.

JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

Positive (POS). E03 has the same LEI as E02, so A09 (2025-09-15, affirmed A, POS) applies to Northwind Holdings.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

Positive. E03 is the same entity as E02 (same LEI), and its latest action, A09 (2025-09-15), has a POS outlook.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

Positive. E03 shares E02's LEI, so it is the same entity, and its latest action is A09 (2025-09-15, POS).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

Positive. E03 shares E02's LEI, so they are one entity, and A09 (2025-09-15) is the latest action with outlook POS.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

Positive. E02 and E03 share an LEI, so they are one entity, and the latest action (A09, 2025-09-15) gives a POS outlook.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

Positive. E03 is the same entity as E02 (same LEI), and its latest action, A09, is an affirmation with a POS outlook.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

Positive. E03 is the same entity as E02 (same LEI), and its latest action A09 (2025-09-15) carries a POS outlook.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

Positive. E03 shares E02's LEI, so they are one entity, and the latest action is A09 (A, POS).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

Positive. E03 is the same entity as E02 (same LEI), and A09 (2025-09-15) is the latest action, with outlook POS.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

Positive. E03 shares E02's LEI, so they are the same entity, and A09 (2025-09-15) affirmed A with a POS outlook.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 1 graded by code

POS. E03 shares E02's LEI, so it is the same legal entity, and A09 (2025-09-15) affirmed A with a Positive outlook, later than A08.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 2 graded by code

Positive (POS). E03 shares E02's LEI, so I treat them as one entity. A09 (2025-09-15) is the latest action and carries a POS outlook.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 3 graded by code

Positive. E03 shares E02's LEI, so it is the same entity, and its latest action is A09 (2025-09-15, Positive), which supersedes A08 (Stable).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 4 graded by code

Positive. E03 shares E02's LEI, so it is the same entity, and A09 (2025-09-15) is the latest action with outlook POS.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 5 graded by code

Positive. E03 shares E02's LEI, so it is the same entity, and A09 (2025-09-15) is the latest action with a POS outlook.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}