Q34, run 2026-11-04-1643-sonnet
Is Halden Foods part of the same group as Halden Bank?
Tests: Groups: a shared name is not a shared group.
Expected: same_group = no
csv run 1
No. E12 has no parent link and a different LEI.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv run 2
No. E12 has no parent link and a different LEI, so the data doesn't connect it to the Halden group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv run 3
No. E12 has no parent link to E09, and the shared name is the only connection.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv run 4
No. E12 has no parent link or shared LEI with the Halden Group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv run 5
No. E12 has no parent link and a different LEI from the Halden Group / Halden Bank chain.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
rdf run 1
No. E12 has no parent link to the Halden group in the data; the shared name alone is not evidence.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
rdf run 2
No. The data records no parent link from E12 to the Halden group, only a similar name.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
rdf run 3
No, going by the data. E12 has no parent or group link, and the shared "Halden" name is not evidence.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
rdf run 4
No. The data has no parent link between E12 and E09/E10, only a similar name.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
rdf run 5
No. The recorded hierarchy puts E12 outside Halden Bank's group (E09, E10, E11). Only the shared name suggests otherwise.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
rdf+ontology run 1
No. E12 has no parent link and a different LEI, so the data does not place it in the Halden group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
rdf+ontology run 2
No. E12 has no parent link to the Halden group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
rdf+ontology run 3
No. Nothing in the data links E12 to E09, E10 or E11, and the similar name is not evidence.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
rdf+ontology run 4
No. E12 has no parent link and no shared LEI with the Halden Bank/Group records.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
rdf+ontology run 5
No. E12 has no parent link to E09, and E10 (the same entity as E17) is a subsidiary of E09.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv+ontology run 1
No. E12 has no parent and a different LEI, so it is not part of the E09 group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv+ontology run 2
No. E12 has no parent and a different LEI, so it is not linked to E09 or E10.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv+ontology run 3
No. E12 has no parent and a different LEI, so it is not linked to E09 or E10.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv+ontology run 4
No. E12 has no parent and a different LEI from the Halden Bank group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv+ontology run 5
No. E12 has a different LEI and no parent link to E09 or E10.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv+markdown run 1
No. E12 has no parent and a different LEI from the Halden Bank group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv+markdown run 2
No. E12 has no parent and a different LEI, so it is not linked to E09 or E10.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv+markdown run 3
No. E12 has no parent and a different LEI, so nothing links it to E09's group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv+markdown run 4
No. E12 has no parent and a different LEI, so it is not in E09's group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv+markdown run 5
No. E12 has no parent link to E09.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv+padding run 1
No. E12 has no parent link to the E09 group, and the data shows no relationship.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv+padding run 2
No. E12 has no parent link and a different LEI from the E09 group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv+padding run 3
No. E12 has no parent link to E09 or E10, and only the name is similar.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv+padding run 4
No. E12 has no parent link to the Halden group (E09, E10, E11) and only shares a name prefix and a different LEI.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
csv+padding run 5
No. E12 has no parent link to the E09/E10/E11 chain, and the shared name is not evidence of a group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}