Q27, run 2026-11-04-1643-sonnet
How is Corvenia Power's 2032 note rated?
Tests: Instrument versus issuer: the subordinated note sits below the issuer.
Expected: rating = A-
csv run 1
A- (A42).
JSON: {"rating": "A-"}
csv run 2
A- (A42).
JSON: {"rating": "A-"}
csv run 3
A- (A42).
JSON: {"rating": "A-"}
csv run 4
A- (A42).
JSON: {"rating": "A-"}
csv run 5
A- (A42).
JSON: {"rating": "A-"}
rdf run 1
A- (A42).
JSON: {"rating": "A-"}
rdf run 2
A- (A42).
JSON: {"rating": "A-"}
rdf run 3
A- (A42, subordinated note I06).
JSON: {"rating": "A-"}
rdf run 4
A- (A42).
JSON: {"rating": "A-"}
rdf run 5
A-. This is A42.
JSON: {"rating": "A-"}
rdf+ontology run 1
A- (A42).
JSON: {"rating": "A-"}
rdf+ontology run 2
A-, from A42 (I06).
JSON: {"rating": "A-"}
rdf+ontology run 3
A-. I06 was assigned A- in A42.
JSON: {"rating": "A-"}
rdf+ontology run 4
A- (A42).
JSON: {"rating": "A-"}
rdf+ontology run 5
A- (A42).
JSON: {"rating": "A-"}
csv+ontology run 1
A-. A42 rates I06 at A-, which is subordinated debt below E15's FC rating of A and within the CV ceiling of A.
JSON: {"rating": "A-"}
csv+ontology run 2
A- (A42).
JSON: {"rating": "A-"}
csv+ontology run 3
A- (A42).
JSON: {"rating": "A-"}
csv+ontology run 4
A-, from A42.
JSON: {"rating": "A-"}
csv+ontology run 5
A-. I06 was assigned A- (A42).
JSON: {"rating": "A-"}
csv+markdown run 1
A- (A42).
JSON: {"rating": "A-"}
csv+markdown run 2
A- (A42).
JSON: {"rating": "A-"}
csv+markdown run 3
A- (A42).
JSON: {"rating": "A-"}
csv+markdown run 4
A-, from A42.
JSON: {"rating": "A-"}
csv+markdown run 5
A- (A42).
JSON: {"rating": "A-"}
csv+padding run 1
A- (A42).
JSON: {"rating": "A-"}
csv+padding run 2
A-, from A42.
JSON: {"rating": "A-"}
csv+padding run 3
A- (A42).
JSON: {"rating": "A-"}
csv+padding run 4
A- (A42).
JSON: {"rating": "A-"}
csv+padding run 5
A- (A42).
JSON: {"rating": "A-"}