Q34, run 2026-11-04-1616-sonnet

← back to the run

Is Halden Foods part of the same group as Halden Bank?

Tests: Groups: a shared name is not a shared group.

Expected: same_group = no

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent link to the Halden group in the data, and only the name is similar.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent and isn't in the E09 chain, so the shared "Halden" name is not evidence of a link.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent and a different LEI, so the data records no link to E09 beyond a similar name.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent link and a different LEI, so the shared "Halden" name is not evidence of a group.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

No. Nothing in the parent links connects E12 to E09, and its LEI prefix is different, so only the name is similar.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R2 rdf run 1 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent or other link to E09/E10, and shares only the "Halden" name.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R2 rdf run 2 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent or other link to E10 or E9 in the data. The shared "Halden" name is not evidence of a group.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

❌ R2 rdf run 3 graded by code

Depends. E12 has no parent or group link to the Halden entities (E09, E10, E11). Only the name is similar, so the data can't settle it.

JSON: {"same_group": "depends"}

Why: same_group: expected no, got depends

✅ R2 rdf run 4 graded by code

No. The data shows no ownership link from E12 to the E09/E10/E11 chain, only a similar name.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R2 rdf run 5 graded by code

No. The data links E12 to no parent, so nothing ties it to the E09/E10/E11 group. The shared "Halden" name is not evidence.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 1 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent link and nothing connects it to E09, so the data does not show it in the same group as E10.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 2 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent link or other connection to the Halden Group (E09, E10, E11); only the name is similar.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 3 graded by code

No. The data links E12 to no parent or group. It shares only the name "Halden" and has no LEI link to E09, E10 or E11.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 4 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent or subsidiary link to the Halden group (E09, E10, E11), and a shared name is not evidence of a group.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 5 graded by code

No, going by the data. E12 has no parent link or ownership tie to the E09/E10 group, and a similar name is not evidence of one.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent and a different LEI, so it is not linked to E09, E10 or E11.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent link and a different LEI, so the data shows no connection despite the similar name.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent and a different LEI, so nothing in the data links it to E09/E10.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent link and its LEI differs, so only the name resembles the Halden group.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

No. E12 has a different LEI and no parent link to the E09 group, so only the name is similar.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}