Q27, run 2026-11-04-1616-sonnet

← back to the run

How is Corvenia Power's 2032 note rated?

Tests: Instrument versus issuer: the subordinated note sits below the issuer.

Expected: rating = A-

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

A- (A42).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

A- (A42).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

A-, from A42.

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

A-, from A42.

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

A-, from A42.

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R2 rdf run 1 graded by code

A-, from A42.

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R2 rdf run 2 graded by code

A- (A42).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R2 rdf run 3 graded by code

A-, from A42.

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R2 rdf run 4 graded by code

A- (A42).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R2 rdf run 5 graded by code

A- (A42).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 1 graded by code

A-. The note is I06, and A42 assigned it A-.

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 2 graded by code

A- (A42, I06).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 3 graded by code

A- (A42).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 4 graded by code

A- (A42).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 5 graded by code

A- (A42). I06 is subordinated.

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

A- (A42).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

A- (A42).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

A-, from A42.

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

A-, from A42.

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

A- (A42).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}